Sitemap: Gaming Bits Front Page
 
 
Call of Duty 4 Xbox 360 VS. Playstation 3 Comparison Video PDF Print E-mail
Written by Alexis M. (Rivithed)   
Friday, 09 November 2007
Infinity Ward's Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare just hit this week. I'm knee deep into the game's single-player campaign. To the point: You need to check it out. This game has some of the most dramatic in-game moments of recent memory. It definitely manages to capture the harsh realities of war. The graphic quality is amazing, but does it make a difference on whether you have the Xbox 360 or PS3?

While I'm able to pick from both the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 platform, the deal breaker usually comes based on the Xbox 360's online play and achievements (where's Home and trophies, Sony?). I'll usually dismiss the graphics as a factor, because of my expectation that the developer has at least taken care to give both platforms a balanced delivery. Nonetheless, I'm always curious, if somewhat skeptic, when these side-by-side video comparisions come out. Check out the video below (or here) from GameTrailers.com and see if the difference is significant enough for you. Which game platform do you usually go for, if you own both consoles?

From Gaming Today

Comments
xbox 360 rocks
Written by Guest on 2007-11-11 00:00:00
it is the best in graphics
HMMM
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
OK i have both systems and i love em both so i am not being biased .  
First.. Unforftunatly it shouldnt be this way but when a game developer uses a sertain platform (like stated alread) when they do that game on the other system they are lazy with i
Tom
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
the games look essentially the same, this is what happens when they develope a game for the ps3 and port it to the 360. 
 
The 360 is a better machine, handles twice the polygons, has better shader handling and twice the memory, so it takes the ps3 game
snoofu
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
can you say SEGA SATURN?
Call of duty 4
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
Was COD 4 really a port ? that sounds pretty fan boyish to me. It was built on PC and then ported to both systems.  
 
xbox 360 is the shit right now, soon ps3 will be dope as well, lets not forget how nuts the ps2 was in its prime. 
 
In the meantime I
BS
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
PS3 has questionable hardware, difficult as far as gaming design goes, great for folding and math equations, I Didn't buy a $599.99 game console to fold though.
difference
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
I see no significant difference... and I'm not in the least bit surprised.  
 
Where is the oh-so-touted graphics advantage Sony?
Live vs. Play
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
Monthly fee versus Free Play. You decide.
your all wrong
Written by Guest on 2007-11-10 00:00:00
it looks best on the wii.  
 
 
Just kidding there just about the same graphics. 
Written by Edwin Hernandez on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
ratchet and clank and gt prologue dont look much better than forza and (insert platformer here). PS3 may eventuall look better than 360, but the question is will it be enough to affect sales?
graphic?
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
I prefer the 360 because of the controller not the graphics, which to my biased eyes look slightly better...
Written by Guest on 2007-11-10 00:00:00
lol there is no difference infinty wards said this all along amazing how ppl have a console and says the graphics looks better when they are the same .... sony alwalys talk **** and never deliver
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
i see no real difference between the two. i would agree that the playstation has certain adventages hardware wise. however these advantages tend to play out later in the console generation. microsoft realized this after the first x box and developed the
eh?
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
^^ "Where is the oh-so-touted graphics advantage Sony?" 
 
Are you thick or something? Look at Ratchet & Clank or Gran Turismo 5 prologue.
could look better than this
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
the reason that this game looks the same on both platforms is because it was developed on ps3 and ported to 360, the 360 is a better console with twice the triangle display capabilities and better shader handling 
 
in short the game simply does not loo
Gametrailers is biased
Written by Guest on 2007-11-20 00:00:00
Gametrailers use a gamma saturation in all Xbox 360 vs PS3 comparision videos. But only in the PS3 side ;)
 
Do you get the point? ;).
playstation 3 will die
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
cause Sony cant afford to keep it alive and will never be profitable. People care more about fun games than realistic looking games. Look at Guitar hero! It will probably be the third best selling game this year behind Mario and Halo
Fanboys >>> shut up both of you
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
PS3 this, Xbox that?  
It's been a year for the PS3, I'm sure as you can see the 3rd parts know what they're doing (EA get on the ball). 
Xbox have some great games, and power.  
 
If companies want to make the same game on both systmes, they should
Hardware vs. Software
Written by Guest on 2007-11-09 00:00:00
Playstation 3 has better Hardware, but if no software company take advantage of that. Then it doesn't matter. Personally, I think PS3 will prove to be better over the long term and have a longer life then xbox 360.
M$
Written by Guest on 2007-12-03 00:00:00
Lets all remeber the UBER SUCCESS then first xbox had over 100 million sol-..oh wait that was sony.. TWICE, with 2 DIFFERENT SYSTEMS, who the hell are all you silly fanboys kidding. ITS SIMPLE MATH people, SONY HAS MORE OF THERE BRAND IN HOMES THAN ANY
This is such a stupid arguement
Written by Guest on 2007-12-08 00:00:00
Enjoy whatever system you have or get all of the big three. This "mine is better than yours" junk is stupid.
ZOMG
Written by Guest on 2007-12-08 00:00:00
Why is every getting so worked up over the graphics? It's just so weird and people are acting so desperate. If the PS3 version of the game has one more raindrop or blade of grass in it then the PS3 fanboys will be like "ZOMG THE PS3 VERSION IS MILES A
Ok...
Written by Guest on 2007-12-08 00:00:00
Does the guy who said that PS3s are more powerful then uber PCs know what he is talking about...OFFCOURSE NOT!Uber gaming PCs stomp PS3s and 360s.
the argument should be
Written by Guest on 2007-12-09 00:00:00
First off its down to choice of games and titles. 
that should be the deciding factor. 
 
just cause one console sold more means nothing as 90% of them may have been re sold as people buy find out its crap 
 
1 Graphics - xbox GPU has faster memory band
Shadowserpent
Written by Guest on 2007-12-09 00:00:00
I love my 360, I bought it when it came out and killed my first one until M$ mailed a free 2nd. I been a gamer since "Pong" in 1980 and still going strong!! However I can recognize a good product when I see one and PS3 will soon join my entertainment
mastercaliber
Written by Guest on 2007-12-17 00:00:00
the 360 is a better console because of the way it was built. on the other hand i am terrified of the fact that because the 360 tries to handle the grafics it overheats and crashes and breaks down the console, clearly not a problem with the playstation 3
Xbox Fanboys
Written by Guest on 2007-12-24 00:00:00
I'm sorry but if you think playstation 3 is garbage, you're retarded. Both systems are great. Xbox came out earlier and has mad a good run, but ps3 is starting to catch on a and lets face it.....its gonna sell quite a few more systems and have quite
Lol
Written by Guest on 2008-01-02 00:00:00
Lol. I bought a brand new xbox 360 in June and had to return it the next day because it froze up and red ringed me. I would gladly trade my 360 for a ps3 any day.  
 
#1, I'm stuck with paying $100 for a 20gb harddrive (rediculous) when you can upgra
FutueofGaming
Written by Guest on 2008-01-20 00:00:00
Its hard to see the graphical advatage when the PS3 is being held back by the < 10gigs of data available for the 360. When you make a game multi-platform you have to tone it down to the system with the lowest abilities... otherwise COD4 would have come
The argument really should be ...
Written by Guest on 2008-02-24 00:00:00
Whoever wrote 'the arguement should be' has no facts and made alot of mistakes. 
 
#1 Xbox = 10 x 48(pipelines) x 500mhz = 240000 ... 240 gigaflops which are FLoating point Operations Per Second  
Ps3 = 27 x 24(pipelines) x 550mhz = 35640
tom youre an ass
Written by Guest on 2008-02-24 00:00:00
tom you are sucha noob, read wikipedia. Ps3's ram is 256x2. 360's is 512. 256 x2 is 512. gpu=256 on ps3, cpu=256 on ps3 . xboxhas got to share it. You dont learn everything from the back of a pc game box under 'specs'. 
Also they dont just put a ga
Console Crusade Losers
Written by Guest on 2008-06-24 00:00:00
I don't understand why people get worked up about which one is better, or which one has better graphics. 
 
Why do you care so much, it's like this weird crusade to defend some product you bought. 
 
Lets be honest if you could afford both you wouldn
They are both good
Written by Guest on 2009-05-31 17:54:41
Both consoles have ups and downs and it is just opinion. I don't own either of them and here are the facts: 
 
The PS3 has a better rig, but the Xbox 360 is easier to develop on. 
Xbox live is higher quality, but PSN is free... 
 
and so on and so forth. Quit arguing over which is better and use them for what you bought them for: TO PLAY GAMES!
Written by Guest on 2009-06-02 15:33:39
whats a "game" ?

Write Comment
Name:Guest
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

< Prev   Next >